From Henry Porter, writing in the Guardian:
"In a letter to the Financial Times, Sebastian Nokes, a climate change sceptic and businessman, said he was interviewed by an officer who "wanted to know what computer I used, my internet service provider, and also to which political parties I have belonged, what I feel about climate change and what my qualifications in climate science are. He questioned me at length about my political and scientific opinions."
So a sceptic of a particular belief can be asked questions by the police, like those above? Just because a Freedom of Information request has been made? To hold a belief that is not the same as that of the government of the day makes one a 'dissenter' and therefore 'suspect'?
Why have we. as a society, allowed this to happen? Where were those who we elect, supposedly to safeguard our freedoms, when this 'process' was made available to the police?
No comments:
Post a Comment